Justice at Stake
Jul 28th, 2008 |
By Dan Pero |
Category: Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake
The Chicago Tribune had a thumbsucker over the weekend on the politicization of America’s judiciary that pushed the usual storyline: Americans are “largely clueless” about the judiciary, providing an opening for “special interest lobbies” to have undue influence over the judicial selection process. The recent election defeat of Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Louis […]
Posted in Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake |
No Comments »
Jul 24th, 2008 |
By Dan Pero |
Category: Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake, Pennsylvania
On July 15, we posted the results of a public opinion survey commissioned by the American Justice Partnership Foundation which revealed that an overwhelming 75% of Americans believe state Supreme Court justices should be elected by the people.
Today, Pennsylvanians for Modern Courts – a group funded by George Soros which is fighting to take away […]
Posted in Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake, Pennsylvania |
3 comments
Jun 16th, 2008 |
By Dan Pero |
Category: Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake, Minnesota, State Battlegrounds
The special-interest apologists who argue for the “merit-selection” of judges often pose as promoters of independence, fair-mindedness and objectivity. Frequently, a friendly journalist takes their bait, not noticing the hook stuck in his mouth.
The latest such journalist is Nathan Bowe of the Detroit Lakes Tribune (MN) in his coverage of a proposal by the Minnesota […]
Posted in Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake, Minnesota, State Battlegrounds |
No Comments »
May 19th, 2008 |
By Dan Pero |
Category: Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake, Michigan, State Battlegrounds
Legal reporter L.L. Brasier of The Detroit Free Press had a hand-wringer yesterday about campaign spending among candidates for Michigan’s 6th Circuit Court judicial race. The article frets that this year’s race could be one of the “most contested … in Oakland County history.” Funny, but I thought competition among candidates was […]
Posted in Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake, Michigan, State Battlegrounds |
No Comments »
May 5th, 2008 |
By Dan Pero |
Category: Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake, Ohio
Justice at Stake – the group bankrolled by billionaire hedge fund manager George Soros – has taken its campaign to elbow voters out of judicial elections to Ohio.
Posted in Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake, Ohio |
No Comments »
Apr 18th, 2008 |
By Dan Pero |
Category: Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake, State Battlegrounds
The Missouri House voted yesterday to keep intact the state’s judicial selection Star Chamber – where lawyers meet behind closed doors to pick judges.
That means – at least for now – judicial selection in Missouri will remain in the hands of the state’s trial bar. Of the seven members of Missouri’s Appellate Judicial Commission, […]
Posted in Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake, State Battlegrounds |
No Comments »
Apr 10th, 2008 |
By Dan Pero |
Category: Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake, State Battlegrounds, Wisconsin
Even the venerable Economist can fall prey to some Justice At Stake propaganda. In its latest issue, The Economist denounced American judicial elections as prone to “unbecoming hoopla.” With typical Economist wit, it looked at the political ads in some of these races as so much Habeas circus, and wondered why we Yanks […]
Posted in Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake, State Battlegrounds, Wisconsin |
No Comments »
Mar 27th, 2008 |
By Dan Pero |
Category: Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake, State Battlegrounds
Who awards blue ribbons? And where can we get one?
The AP reports that a “blue-ribbon panel” in Carson City, Nevada, voted 18 to 2 to place before Nevada voters in 2010 a constitutional change to scrap the direct election of judges with a political selection process.
Similar plans have been put before the voters and […]
Posted in Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake, State Battlegrounds |
No Comments »
Mar 25th, 2008 |
By Dan Pero |
Category: Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake, State Battlegrounds, Trial Lawyers
Opponents of state judicial elections can often accomplish the trick of sounding high-minded while opposing democracy. They have a point of sorts—if all the noise and heat of a political campaign strikes you as beneath the dignity of the American people. To the rest of us, it looks like the raucous political dialogue of a […]
Posted in Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake, State Battlegrounds, Trial Lawyers |
No Comments »
Mar 24th, 2008 |
By Dan Pero |
Category: Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake
In a contest of fact versus fiction, fiction has lately been getting the upper hand.
You can see this in movies - the latest example being Michael Clayton in which trial lawyers are portrayed as Don Quixotes jousting with evil corporations. A recent Wall Street Journal op-ed took John Grisham to task for The Appeal, a novel that picks […]
Posted in Judicial Elections, Justice at Stake |
No Comments »