State Battlegrounds

Positive Review For Michigan’s Supreme Court

Oct 10th, 2008 | By Dan Pero | Category: Judicial Elections, Michigan, State Battlegrounds

Matthew Schneider, a visiting professor at Michigan’s Thomas M. Cooley Law School, has just issued a serious, scholarly analysis of Michigan’s Supreme Court.  Among his conclusions:
… there is broad agreement among conservative legal scholars that Michigan’s highest court has greatly advanced the delicate art of being faithful to the law while, at the same time, […]



More Lies In Michigan Court Race

Oct 9th, 2008 | By Dan Pero | Category: Judicial Elections, Michigan, State Battlegrounds

Would the National Rifle Association (NRA) endorse a candidate who wanted to “ban hunting” and “take away our rights” to hunt on private property?  Of course not.  But that’s the lie being circulated by Judge Diane Marie Hathaway in her campaign to unseat Michigan Chief Justice Cliff Taylor. (Full disclosure: my wife, Colleen, is managing […]



Hillbilly Heroin And The Unholy Alliance Between Trial Lawyers and State AGs

Oct 9th, 2008 | By Dan Pero | Category: State Battlegrounds, Tort Reform, Trial Lawyers, West Virginia

The West Virginia State Journal takes a long look at yet one more example of the unholy alliance between state Attorneys General and wealthy trial lawyers.  Four years ago, West Virginia Attorney General Darrell McGraw agreed to a $10 million settlement in the state’s lawsuit against the maker of OxyContin – a painkiller so widely […]



Lies, Damn Lies, and Michigan’s Supreme Court Election

Oct 7th, 2008 | By Dan Pero | Category: Judicial Elections, Michigan, State Battlegrounds

Once again, the blogosphere has caught the mainstream media asleep at the switch.  RightMichigan.com does a devastating dissection of the lies being peddled by opponents of Michigan Supreme Court Chief Justice Cliff Taylor.  A left wing group has taken out billboard ads on the side of busses across the state claiming that a University of […]



Supporters Of Democratic Elections Hit Back In Wisconsin

Oct 6th, 2008 | By Dan Pero | Category: Judicial Elections, State Battlegrounds, Wisconsin

An editorial in Wisconsin’s Capital Times strikes back against the “campaign” launched by another paper, the Wisconsin State Journal, to end democratic judicial elections and adopt a “merit” selection system.  While I disagree with just about everything the Capital Times says about the decision by Wisconsin voters to oust Justice Louis Butler and its call […]



Missouri Legal Special Interest Group Comes Out Against Reform

Sep 26th, 2008 | By Dan Pero | Category: Judicial Elections, Missouri, State Battlegrounds

Surprise, surprise. Prime Buzz reports that the Missouri Bar Association has come out against a proposal by gubernatorial candidate Kenny Hulshof to reduce the influence of legal special interest groups (like the Bar Association) in selecting Missouri judges.  Prime Buzz has posted the full text of the Bar Association’s statement.  You can read my previous […]



The Politics of “Non-Political” Judicial Selection

Sep 22nd, 2008 | By Dan Pero | Category: Judicial Elections, Minnesota, State Battlegrounds

Proponents of abolishing democratic election of judges always claim that “merit” selection gets politics out of the process.  But Minnesota judicial candidate Dan Griffith gives us a peek into the backroom dealing that goes on when judges are chosen in secret by “merit” panels controlled by lawyers.
There’s a strong correlation between those who actually end […]



West Virginia Legislator Gets It Half Right

Sep 22nd, 2008 | By Dan Pero | Category: Judicial Elections, State Battlegrounds, West Virginia

West Virginia Democratic State Senator Jeff Kessler has got “merit” selection all figured out:
I’m inclined to believe that election is the best way.  Judicial selection by (merit) committee is still politics – just a narrower group.
But Sen. Kessler, who chairs the state legislature’s Senate Judiciary Committee, is pushing for public financing of judicial races to […]



Opponents of Democratic Judicial Elections Keep Pushing The Rock Up The Hill In PA

Sep 19th, 2008 | By Dan Pero | Category: Judicial Elections, Pennsylvania, State Battlegrounds

For about 20 years, a group called Pennsylvanians for Modern Courts (PMC) has been lobbying to abolish democratic judicial elections in the state by revoking the right of 8.3 million Pennsylvania voters to decide who will sit on their courts and turn the job over to a 14-member committee dominated by lawyers.
Proponents of this scheme […]



Rendell States His Position

Sep 18th, 2008 | By Dan Pero | Category: Judicial Elections, Pennsylvania, State Battlegrounds

Yesterday, Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell came out in favor of state legislation that would help to end democratic judicial elections.  “Our system of electing appellate judges makes no sense at all,” Gov. Rendell said.
So allowing the people to choose who sits on the bench “makes no sense at all?”  This is the same system that […]